Suggested Strategic Solutions to the Constraints in Funds and Investment Management of Urban Co-operative Banks

Devika. J *

Department of Co-operative Management, College of Co-operation, Banking and Management, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Misha Davis A.

Department of Co-operative Management, College of Co-operation, Banking and Management, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: With a focus on their socioeconomic importance in urban and semi-urban regions, the essay offers a thorough analysis of the difficulties Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) encounter when managing capital and investments. It looks at things like operational inefficiencies, complicated regulations, scarce resources, and pressure from other competing financial institutions. It investigates topics such as non-performing assets, fraud prevention, contemporary banking services, loan and deposit mix, and regulatory compliance through the examination of primary data. The paper identifies systemic barriers and suggests technology adoption, improved employee training, and strategic policy changes to increase UCBs' operational effectiveness and resilience while upholding their core cooperative values. The study used stratified sampling, selecting 12 UCBs across Kerala's regions, with three directors representing diverse categories. The study emphasises the difficulties Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) encounter when managing their funds and investments. High non-performing assets (NPAs), a lacklustre technology infrastructure, and deficiencies in personnel training are among the main conclusions. Regular policy changes  make it more difficult to comply with regulations. The mix of loans and deposits shows weaknesses in using analytics and adjusting to market conditions. Updated systems and improved training  are necessary for fraud prevention measures. Customer resistance and integration issues are limiting the uptake of contemporary financial services. The suggestions include diversifying financial goods, using cutting-edge technologies, providing personnel training, and enhancing infrastructure.

Conclusion: Urban Cooperative Banks face regulatory constraints, limited funding, insufficient technology, and training gaps. Investments in modern tools, proactive compliance, and enhanced training programs are essential for growth and resilience.

Keywords: UCBs, Fund Management, Investment Management, Garrett’s ranking, Constraints


How to Cite

J, Devika., and Misha Davis A. 2025. “Suggested Strategic Solutions to the Constraints in Funds and Investment Management of Urban Co-Operative Banks”. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology 43 (5):154-62. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2025/v43i52746.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.